Carer’s and UK social work law Essay

Carers accept support from the civil jurisprudence, non punish by the criminal fair play. To what limit do you consider the justness treats carers? Carers have become an essential aspect in the lives of the UK citizens. A carer displace be referred to as anyone who cares, unpaid, for a friend or family member who due to illness, disability, a mental healthyness problem, or an addiction cannot cope without his or her (carer) support. at that place are various reasons behind any somebody taking on caring are varied, but can contain causes much(prenominal) as drilld physical illness, Long-term physical disability, Long-term neurological conditions, Mental health problems, Dementia, Addiction, Learning difficulties. Just as the reason why someone becomes a carer varies, the same is the case for the tasks that a carer fulfills. These tasks include practical hall(a) hold tasks, personal care and emotional support among umteen differents. Just like any other in dividual in United body politic, the carers needs protective cover by the honor especially the civil honor and not being subjected to punishment by the criminal law. The justice trunk in the United body politic is the mechanism that upholds the rule of law. The countrys courts provide a forum that is effective in settlement disputes as well as to test and enforce laws in a rational and fair manner. Moreover, the courts system has formed the basis for the solving of any disputes and law breaking offences in the community and at all levels (Swain & Rice, 2009). Law and neighborly act upon have become an definitive aspect in the United Kingdom accessible set up. It refers to the crossing point amongst the carrying out of the communal swear out and the court-ordered loving structure in the country. This includes components of the legal system such as the legal establishments (prisons and courts among others), case law, and legal experts such as the judges, attorneys, forensic experts, paralegals, and alternative dispute resolution, among many others. Law plays numerous significant roles in the carers invest of amicable work. For example, from an environmental viewpoint, the legal structure is an essential part of any clients social setting. numerous social work clients are concerned with legal structures, such as criminal justice, child security, or mental health. Carers need to be sensitive of the laws that controls or regulates every structure so as to uphold clients steer their way through these structures more efficiently, and to be capable of advocating for law improvement to improve the justice of fit linking clients and their socio-legal surroundings. In addition, laws as well as oversee loads of interactions of interest to social work clients (McIvor & Raynor, 200). These include relationships such as tenant/landlord, employer/worker, patient/physician, children and parents as well as customer/vendor among others relationships. Hen ce, familiarity of the law ought to give-up the ghost practitioners with a realistic perceptive of their clients rights and responsibilities in a wide variety of social relations. Subsequent, organization-specific laws regulate a number of social agencies such as the hospitals, social assistance, schools, mental health facilities, correctional institutions, and other social agencies. Organization-specific laws may order who is qualified for profits, principles for record keeping, privacy, and other client civil rights (McIvor & Raynor, 200). Carers or better exempt fond workers have to comprehend these laws in turn to make sure that their organizations abide by the laws, and to be able to advocate for modifications in the law so as to encourage better and bigger frugal and social impartiality. Thirdly, different laws control the occupation of social work itself. Mostly thither are licensing and/or authorization laws that control the carrying out of social work, as well as who possibly give practice and what values of performance are lawfully allowed for them to perform. Carers should too be conscious of unprofessional conduct or (tort) bylaws that make out when a carer may be legally accountable for inducing injury or harm to a customer if they carry out their practiced duties in an approach that falls infra a rational level of care. In summary, some carers has their work in forensic surroundings, conducting examinations, valuation, and treatment for clients baffling in court or other legal systems. Such settings include probation, prison, child custody assessment, and loose committal to mental health foundations (McIvor & Raynor, 200). Despite being vital in the governance of any country, thither is great difference between the civil and criminal law. The two are different as well as broad components of law with distinct of laws and punishments. The disparity stuck between criminal law and civil law is reflected on the two varied objects w hich law seeks to practise, put right or penalty. The constituent of civil law is the putting right of do bys through by forceful compensation or repayment the offender is not penalized he only undergoes so much harm as is indispensable to make good the wrong he has done. The person who has suffered gets a specific benefit from the law, or at least he avoids a loss. Alternatively, in the case of crimes, the main objective of the law is to discipline the reprobate to give him and others strong enticements not to commit same or identical crimes, as well as to change him preferably and similarly satisfy the commonplace sense that wrongdoing ought to meet with revenge. For example, the criminal law entails cases such as burglary, assault, dispatch among others while the civil entails aspects such as malpractice and negligence (Swain & Rice, 2009). Over the time the social work and the law in United Kingdom has come along together forming a relationship where one cannot do witho ut the other. The law calls for a must registration of the carers in one of the many registers organizations in the country. This allows for the effective testimonial of the carers by the law. This has brought along a clear understanding of the law and in turn defining what is ethically right for the caregivers in their work. The social law has called for Carers need to recognize diversity in the caring services. Respecting and Valuing service users, irrespective of, for example, their ethical definitions, gender or age is central to excellent practice by the . It is likewise about working in a way that counters the unfair or unequal treatment of individuals or groups on the basis of their race, gender, class, age, culture, religion, sexuality or ability. There is a growing body of law that seeks to abate and punish a range of discriminatory behaviors in various kinds of social setting, for example in the purvey of services and in employment opportunities. For social workers, va luing diversity entails more than this. sociable work professionals need to be aware that in that location are structural dimensions to discrimination. The law defines what the carer ought to observe when offering their services to their clients. One of the headstone aspects that they are supposed to observe is the need to protect the rights and support the interests of service users and carers. In addition, the law too requires the carers to strive towards establishing and maintaining the confidence and trust of service users and carers or themselves. Other requirement by the law to the social care givers include promote the independence of service users while protecting them as far as possible from danger or harm. Valuing the rights of service users whilst in search to ensure that their behavior does not smart themselves or other people. Endorse public trust and confidence in social care services, and also be e responsible for the quality of their work and take responsibil ity for maintaining and improving their knowledge and skills. Social work is a responsible and demanding job. Practitioners work in social settings characterised by enormous diversity, and they perform a range of roles, requiring different skills. Public expectations, agency requirements, resources, and the needs of service users all create pressures for social workers. The public receives only a snapshot of a social workers responsibilities and, against a background of media constriction on the sensational, the thousands of successful outcomes and years of hard work in childcare and with vulnerable adults are neer considered. In intervening in peoples lives, social workers face practice dilemmas arising from the relationship between social work values and the law (for example, working to promote the rights and self-determination of service users and having to balance this with the need to protect them and to protect the rights of others (Swain & Rice, 2009). The relations hip between social work and the law is part of an ongoing debate. There are those who adopt a legalistic model and argue that the law, reflected through court orders, is central to social work practice (for example, Blom-Cooper, 1985). Others have argued that over-reliance on the law fails to address the problems people face and may even aggravate them. This seems to present a dilemma for practice. The growing importance of the law in social work practice and decision-making is reflected in the training requirements for professionals working in the field of social work (Department of Health, 2002). Yet it is essential that alongside this there is a value base with an emphasis on principles, such as partnership, equality, and empowerment, which must intercommunicate good practice (Bashir, 1999). Over the past two decades, there have been a number of events that brocaded serious questions regarding social work practice. There has been fierce debate in relation to child protecti on issues, the changes within the criminal justice system (for example the introduction, by the Crime and Disorder work out 1998, of anti-social deportment orders) and the effectiveness of community care. There have been well-documented tragedies and errors of judgement (Blom-Cooper, 1985), apparent over-zealousness such as in the Cleveland social function (Butler-Sloss, 1988) and the misuse of power in residential care in the pin down affair (Levy and Kahan, 1991). For many professionals in the field of social work, the publicity surrounding these and other events has led to a feeling of crisis. Social work as a profession has frequently been under attack since the mid-1980s, and this has undermined the publics sense of social works successes. For example, one of the observations about the Children Act 1989 was that it was based on current top hat practice within social work at the time, though such practice was not sufficiently widespread. The Act represented a new start for children, families, and other professionals working with children by radically ever-changing the legal example regulating the care and upbringing of children (Hardy and Hannibal, 1997). No legislation or legal framework can remain static, however, and because of reviews and enquiries such as the Victoria Climbie interrogative Report (Department of Health and Home Office, 2003), the Children Act 1989 has been significantly updated, and the way in which it is interpreted, resourced and implemented has been strengthened (Braye & Preston, 1997). The law is one way in which realised but discriminatory practices can be and are challenged. At the same time, however, the law can be seen as supportive of the prevailing social order, shaped by dominant forces that perpetuate inequality and injustice. Nevertheless, there are some key values embedded in legislation that are supportive of social work values. For example, the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998 incorporates the provisions of t he European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law, with the result that the principles enshrined in the articles of the ECHR are directly applicable within the UK. These principles include respect for family privacy (Article 8) and an insistence on adjective fairness in the resolution of disputes (Article 6). Further, Article 14 aims at ensuring that the rights contained within the ECHR are secured without discrimination on any ground. The impact of the HRA 1998 on social care and social work has already been considerable (Bashir, 1999). Thus, it is cardinal to recognise that the law expresses some values that accord with social work values and can benefactor you to work in a positive way to support and empower service users. However, it is also important for social work practitioners to be aware of the ways in which the law can fail people. For example, there is little legislation to protect adults who are vulnerable through age. Community care legislation may provide that certain people are entitled to an assessment of their needs, but this is largely at the daintiness of the local authority and it can be difficult for service users to challenge such decision-making (Bashir, 1999). Although agency policies and procedures also set parameters within which discretion is exercised, often the individual social worker makes the initial decision. This choice will be influenced by a range of factors, including the knowledge and understanding of the social worker, his or her experience of similar situations, the viability of available options including the law and ongoing policy and the social workers own values (Braye & Preston, 1997). terminal Social work practice is based upon assessments of situations and decisions about strategies to be adopted. Sometimes there can be a tension between the law and working within social work values the law provides the framework for practice. In the next section, you are going to examine the legal structu res and processes within which social work skills are applied. In summary, it is vital for the civil carers to have support from the law and most importantly from the civil law and the social work law in United Kingdom, and not to be punished by the criminal law. The law forms the framework of all the actions carried out by the carers and in turn, it rather than being punished should protect them.ReferencesBaker, C. (ed.) (1998)Human Rights Act 1998 A Practitioners Guide, capital of the United Kingdom, Sweet andMaxwell.Bashir, A. (1999) Working in racialist Britain,Community Care, 2127 October, p. 26.Biehal, N., Clayden, J., Stein, M. and Wade, J. (1992)Prepared for Living? A Survey of Young People exit the Care of Three Local Authorities, London, National Childrens Bureau.Blom-Cooper, L. (1985)A Child in Trust The Beckford Report, London, London Borough ofBrent.Braye, S. and Preston-Shoot, M. (1997)Practising Social Work Law, Basingstoke, Macmillan.Brechin, A. (2000) Introducing c ritical practice in Brechin, A., Brown, H. and Eby, M.A.(eds)Practice and Health in Social Care, London, Sage.British Association of Social Workers (2003)Code of Ethics for Social Workonline.www.basw.co.uk/articles Accessed 12 September 2005.Butler-Sloss, E. (1988)Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland, London, HMSO.McIvor, G., & Raynor, P. (2007).Developments in social work with offenders. London JessicaKingsley.Hayes, D., Humphries, B., & Cohen, S. (2004).Social work, immigration and introduction Debates,dilemmas and ethical issues for social work and social care practice. London Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Swain, P. A., & Rice, S. (2009).In the shadow of the law The legal context of social work practice. Annandale, N.S.W The Federation PressSource document